Intel’s budget workstation GPU, the Intel Arc Pro B50 has finally made an appearance on Geekbench benchmarks, and the numbers may just surprise you. Although the Intel Arc Pro 50 B falls roughly 20-25% behind the Arc B570 in raw Vulkan and OpenCL performance, it brings “more than workstation-worthy features”, including more VRAM and a wider memory bus than its predecessor – which gives it the drop on both AI and professional workloads.
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Arc B570 – Comparison Summary
Intel Arc Pro B50 is based on the Xe2 GPU architecture, which relies on BMG-G21 die. Whereas Arc B570 sported 18 Xe2 cores, Intel Arc Pro B50 is limited to a cut-down configuration of 16 Xe2 cores. Of course, that puts the Intel Arc Pro B50 at disadvantage in synthetic tests.
In Geekbench:
- Intel Arc Pro B50 Vulkan score: 78,661
- Intel Arc Pro B50 OpenCL score: 69,890
By comparison, the B570 hits around nearly 100k and 85k points in Vulkan and OpenCL respectively. This would mean the Intel Arc Pro B50 is around 20 – 25% slower than the Arc B570.
Why Intel Arc Pro B50 is Still Getting Some Attention
It may be slower on paper, but the Intel Arc Pro B50 brings crucial workstation-focused advantages:
- 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM vs 10 GB on Arc B570
- 256-bit memory interface, The memory on Arc B570 160 bit vs.
- (Up to) PCIe 5.0 interface vs PCIe 4.0
These enhancements help to give the Intel Arc Pro B50 a competitive edge in AI-focused workloads and processing large datasets or when creating professional content where memory bandwidth is more important than raw synthetic scores.
Geekbench Benchmarks Explained
It is important to note that Geekbench scores can change dramatically from one run to the next. Real-world performance may vary based on the applications you’re using, but the Intel Arc Pro B50 consistently finishes behind the Arc B570. Artificial benchmarks are not always the full story, particularly for a workstation GPU such as the Intel Arc Pro B50.
Launch and Availability
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is not yet officially announced for retail, and we don’t know its price yet. The Arc Pro B50 as well as the higher-end Arc Pro B60 will be available soon, though you may encounter limited supply. There are reports some models, like the And Pro B60 Dual from Maxsun, will only ship in pre-built systems at first, with standalone cards coming later.
Availability issues might also place more of a squeeze on the Arc Pro B60 than the Arc Pro B50, with Intel said to be experiencing some production problems when it comes to higher-end workstation-grade GPUs.
Verdict: Should You Wait for the Intel Arc Pro B50?
The Intel Arc Pro B50 might not win any synthetic benchmarks against the Arc B570, but with more VRAM, more memory throughput and optimizations for workstation-based activities, this could be a highly prized card for creators and AI focused workloads. It might still be the better choice if you’re a gamer, considering the Arc B570. But if memory bandwidth and sustained performance are a concern to you, the Intel Arc Pro B50 could potentially prove the smarter investment once we see actual pricing emerge.
FAQ
How much slower is Intel Arc Pro B50 (Geekbench Vulkan and OpenCL) compared to Arc B570? A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 is roughly 20–25% slower on average in Geekbench Vulkan and OpenCL than the Arc B570.
Is 16 GB enough? How good is the 16GB GDDR6 with the 256 Interface. A: Absolutely yes, the Intel Arc Pro B50 comes with 16 GB GDDR6 that is paired to a 256-bit interface compare to the 10 GB with 160-bit bus on the Arc B570.
Yes, though initial availability may be restricted, with many units first reaching consumers as an option built into systems before they are offered on their own at retail.
What about AI, Machine learning, and professional content creation – does the GPU’s bigger VRAM and higher memory bandwidth pay off?
Your blog is a constant source of inspiration for me. Your passion for your subject matter shines through in every post, and it’s clear that you genuinely care about making a positive impact on your readers.
Thank you for your valuable feedback.